Karen Learn received regardless of Decide Cannone and the hackerama

Now why they don’t enable cameras within the federal courts.

They don’t need all people discovering out simply how corrupt the judicial system is, high to backside. If individuals may watch extra of those high-profile trials, and even simply stream the audio on-line as they’re driving round, are you aware how outraged they’d turn out to be?

About as outraged because the voters in Norfolk County are after watching the tried lynching of Karen Learn.

Decide Beverly Cannone’s appalling conduct was nearly past parody, her prejudices so out within the open, her dedication to guard her beloved hackerama so apparent.

On Wednesday evening, after the decision, Opinion Diagnostics did a fast ballot of registered voters in Norfolk County. Solely 18 p.c of the respondents permitted of Decide Auntie Bev’s conduct within the case.

Eighteen p.c — that should symbolize how many individuals within the pattern didn’t watch a second of the trial, as a result of if they’d, they’d be as disgusted as the opposite 82 p.c about how desperately the hacks have been attempting to border an harmless lady, to guard themselves and their vile fellow payroll patriots.

The day after the decision, I requested Alan Jackson, the lead legal professional for the protection, if he’d had any doubts about his means to get a good trial for his shopper.

“I used to be in monumental doubt,” he mentioned. “Did I doubt whether or not I may get a good trial? Nearly each single minute of each single day.”

He talked about how one in every of his witnesses, most certainly Dr. Marie Russell, the very plausible professional on canine bites, was nearly prevented from telling the jury some very primary truths in regards to the wounds on the sufferer’s arm.

“That is nonetheless surprising to me,” Jackson mentioned. “Each query I requested was objected to by Hank Brennan, and 100% of his objections have been sustained. I’ve by no means seen that in 30 years of observe. Actually, 49 objections and 49 sustained objections.”

That sort of gross miscarriage of justice by no means occurs on Netflix, does it? However that is actual life. In Norfolk County, no less than.

“Speak about attempting to maintain the data from the jurors! I needed to ask the questions 17 instances in 5 totally different instructions to get the data in entrance of the jury. I’ve by no means had a scenario the place the choose sustained each single objection by the prosecution. Statistically, that’s not possible.”

Besides in a Norfolk County courtroom.

“I didn’t really feel this was an neutral choose,” he continued. “I simply didn’t. I don’t suppose anyone who was watching would argue with that. This was probably the most difficult case I’ve ever tried in my life. We didn’t win due to the method. We received regardless of the method that was put in place in that Dedham courtroom. It was a travesty, an absolute travesty.”

Would Jackson need to say something to the choose?

“Do higher,” he mentioned. “Don’t attempt to put your thumb on the dimensions. No choose ought to ever attempt to put your thumb on the dimensions.”

Besides in Massachusetts. Right here it’s SOP — commonplace working process.

As a result of he lives in California and doesn’t observe a lot right here, Jackson may afford to be extra candid than native attorneys. However even he mentioned, “I’ve to watch out…”

The issue is, if a lawyer publicly calls out a choose over their appalling conduct, the repercussions will be extreme. You don’t even have to be a lawyer. Once I was jammed up in a civil case involving a radio contract a couple of years again, I had the regulation on my facet. However not the judges.

As one of many legal professionals for my foes sneeringly informed me, “You suppose any choose in Massachusetts goes to provide you a good shake after what you’ve written about them?”

Unhappy to say, he was proper. This state sucks, what can I say?

Within the halls of justice, the one justice is within the halls. As I at all times say, it’s not that every one Massachusetts judges are corrupt. It’s simply that 98% of them who give such a nasty identify to the opposite 2%.

And suppose what they will do to a practising lawyer. Karen Learn’s native legal professional, David Yannetti, must be much more prudent in his feedback about this current travesty of justice in Dedham.

As a special lawyer texted me Friday:

“If a Mass. atty. dared to complain of the outrageous antics of Decide Bev to the Judicial Conduct Fee, the legal professional who complained could be blackballed by the whole state judiciary. Indisputable fact. That lawyer and regulation agency will not obtain any kind of favorable judgments and rulings and all circumstances will go towards them for daring to reveal judicial malfeasance. That is how the mob often known as the Mass. judiciary will get to thrive and bastardize justice.

“P.S. Search for odd judicial rulings towards Yannetti in any future state circumstances his agency has.”

I hope not. However one factor we all know for positive: Nothing goes to occur to Auntie Bev. Hell, even Decide Shelley Joseph isn’t going to get greater than a slap on the wrist for letting a profession felony unlawful alien drug supplier out the again door of her court docket home. She didn’t miss a single paycheck. The taxpayers paid for her complete authorized protection after she was indicted by the feds.