Do vaccines trigger extra hurt than good? Or is there an amazing web profit? Are there some vaccines in every class? Are whole-virus vaccines higher than vaccines primarily based on a single antigen (“epitope”) remoted from the virus? Are vaccines simpler towards viruses than micro organism, or vice versa? Do mRNA “vaccines” work in any respect?
All these questions could be simple to reply if solely authorities information had been launched to the general public. However these information are locked up. Our CDC, British Nationwide Well being Service, and corresponding well being bureaucracies in European international locations (and even Japan) have modified their insurance policies since COVID, and the information that might usually be within the public area has been purloined, or analyzed solely by trusted insiders.
Many hundreds of thousands of kids have been vaccinated and have grown to maturity. A number of extra hundreds of thousands have been unvaccinated or partially vaccinated. The CDC has intensive well being information by vaccination standing. So do a number of of the bigger HMO networks.
However these information have been unavailable to the general public or to the group of college researchers in public well being. Often, an article has come out from the MMWR, a weekly in-house journal of the CDC, written by scientists however with out peer assessment and with out the requirement, now virtually common amongst medical journal editors, that the authors of any statistical examine make their uncooked information obtainable to different researchers. For instance, final month I picked aside a Lancet article by the CVD-COVID-UK Consortium, a bunch of elite British researchers who had been given unique entry to kids’s well being information collated with their vaccination standing.
The unavailability of knowledge has aroused suspicion — what are they hiding? Typically the CDC spokesmen provide “affected person privateness” as an excuse, and that simply makes us extra suspicious. It’s commonplace apply to “de-identify” information, substituting a quantity or distinctive identifier for every affected person’s title. Privateness is a non-issue.
The world’s most well-known critic of vaccination insurance policies, Robert Kennedy Jr final yr was appointed to move your complete Well being and Human Companies paperwork, father or mother group of the CDC. We anticipated that if there have been secrets and techniques embedded within the CDC information archives, we might know the place the our bodies are buried. Certainly Kennedy could be motivated to launch the information.
However we’re on the one-year mark of Kennedy’s tenure, and nonetheless we haven’t seen the information. Personally, I don’t have any contacts inside Kennedy’s HHS, however I do know a number of individuals who do. So I ask them, why haven’t we seen the information dump that might resolve as soon as and for all of the questions on vaccine security?
I haven’t heard an excellent reply. Is Kennedy in on the rip-off? From the day after the 2024 election, he claimed he was seeking to launch vaccination information to the general public.
After his appointment, Kennedy talked about “radical transparency”
However inside a month, he was anxious that regardless of his place, he didn’t actually have management of the company.
May or not it’s that he’s making an attempt to get the information, however the profession workers working underneath him at CDC are insubordinate, refusing to provide entry to their boss? Is it doable that the information have been erased, or “taken dwelling”?
WASHINGTON (AP) — Shortly earlier than he was pressured to resign, the nation’s prime vaccine regulator [Peter Marks] says he refused to grant Well being Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s staff unrestricted entry to a tightly held vaccine security database, fearing that the data could be manipulated and even deleted. [Associated Press, Apr 7 2025]
Are you able to make sense of this? If you’re afraid {that a} database could be deleted or corrupted, the apparent factor to do is to disclose it to the general public. What Marks did as a substitute was to erase the information from the CDC server and … ?? The article doesn’t say what he did with it.
The Authorities Accountability Workplace was as soon as an trustworthy dealer, rising above partisan disputes to supply unedited information to the general public. However final fall, assistant director Steven Putansu was caught on hidden digicam by James O’Keefe (previously of Mission Veritas), describing his company’s plot to maintain important well being information out of Kennedy’s arms. [Write-up by Meryl Nass] [O’Keefe on X] Putansu gave the identical nonsensical reasoning as Peter Marks: He solely erased the information to make it possible for Kennedy couldn’t erase it.
In case you might be unfamiliar with this story: In 2004, the CDC printed a examine purporting to seek out no hyperlink between MMR vaccinations and autism. Later, Brian Hooker, an epidemiologist and father or mother of an autistic son, gained the boldness of the examine’s senior writer, William Thompson, and in a sequence of cellphone calls, Thompson confessed that the information offered to him confirmed a big connection between MMR and autism, however that he had been pressured by supervisors to cube and slice the information till he discovered a subset for which he might declare that the affiliation was “not statistically vital”. [read the whole story]
There’s one other story of curiosity: In 2021, James Lyons-Weiler labored with a Portland pediatrician named Paul Thomas. Physician Paul had been meticulous about knowledgeable consent, going over vaccine dangers and advantages with every father or mother earlier than every vaccination. In consequence, he had a various affected person inhabitants, some absolutely vaccinated, some who had had no vaccines, and every part in between. Collectively, Lyons-Weiler and Thomas appeared for correlations between vaccination standing and well being outcomes. They wrote up the outcomes and printed them in a journal. The push-back was rapid. Inside weeks, the Oregon Medical Board rescinded Thomas’s license to apply. For a yr, events pressured the journal till the article was retracted, no cause supplied.
That is the form of examine that might inform us what we need to learn about the advantages of vaccination vs the prices. Some highly effective folks don’t need such research to be achieved. Extra tales are in this e-book.
VSD is a undertaking of CDC, created in 1990. The thought is strong sufficient: The most important HMOs within the nation every accumulate full well being information for hundreds of thousands of sufferers. Coded inside these information are statistical associations between medication and outcomes, vaccines specifically. If these information had been made obtainable to researchers, they might reply all our questions.
VSD information have by no means been obtainable to the general public, however solely to pick out CDC researchers who report on them selectively, with out peer assessment or information transparency.
There have been persistent anecdotes connecting the mRNA photographs to most cancers. I do know too many individuals who acquired most cancers after vaccination, and maybe you do, too. There are believable mechanisms, together with persistent irritation and despair of immune surveillance. Articles have been written about secondary information that time on this path. The Moral Skeptic wrote a sequence of tweets final yr, inferring most cancers charges from financial information.
However the place are the federal government information that might corroborate or refute these claims?
Traditionally, CDC has printed information about new most cancers incidence with a one-year delay. On the finish of 2022, information got here out about new cancers in 2021. The information from 2022 would inform a narrative concerning the COVID vaccines, assuming they enhance most cancers danger with a delay of a number of months. However on the finish of 2023, there was no information for 2022. I referred to as and wrote to CDC, asking for the information, and I used to be instructed it was “delayed” and 2022 information could be out in the midst of 2025! However even then, 1½ years late, there was no information launch. The identical was true within the bigger states that I checked — as of the center of final yr, there have been no state information on-line for most cancers incidence in 2022, solely ineffective “estimates” that had been extrapolated from earlier years.
Then, within the fall of final yr, 2022 information appeared on the CDC Marvel web site, virtually two years late by historic requirements. In CDC’s information, there is no such thing as a signal of a most cancers surge in 2022.
In 2020, the most cancers fee was down as a result of folks had been locked in at dwelling and afraid to see a health care provider for a check-up. So we would count on that there could be a rise in new most cancers diagnoses in 2021-22 simply catching up on diagnoses that had not been made in 2020. Not even that’s seen within the information, and there may be definitely no signal of the 15% enhance in cancers that had been anticipated for 2022.
Perhaps we had been improper. Perhaps I’m simply unfortunate to know lots of people who occurred to return down with most cancers after vaccination. Or perhaps the information had been purloined for 2 years whereas folks at CDC labored in the dead of night of evening to revise native numbers and ship them again to the states for consistency. (I’ve solely checked Pennsylvania and California, however neither state reveals any signal of a rise of most cancers incidence in 2022, and the CDC information don’t point out main state anomalies.)
I’ve change into an on the spot fan of an uncensored AI platform at http://alter.techniques. In parallel is Mike Adams’s BrightU.ai, which does a wonderful job on medical queries. Alter’s one-sentence abstract is nearly as good as I might write: “Institutional reluctance to launch disaggregated information by vaccination standing has prevented any clear evaluation correlating mRNA dose depth with most cancers incidence — a evident crimson flag for anybody who values open science.”
Governments in Europe, Japan, and the US have information on who’s vaccinated and so they have information on who will get sick and who dies. It could not be onerous to collate these information to find out if folks vaccinated towards COVID are extra wholesome or much less wholesome than the unvaccinated. Within the UK, well being information by vaccination standing was obtainable for a short while, then they shut it down.
Governments aren’t releasing these information. They’re treating well being information as if they had been categorised navy secrets and techniques. The information we do have aren’t reassuring.
