Far-left Texas State Consultant and senatorial candidate James Talarico sat for a 15-minute interview on Wednesday with CBS Information White Home and election correspondent Ed O’Keefe and, due to its brief period and O’Keefe doubtless eager to cowl a complete slew of subjects, skated by with dodgy solutions on his radical views about transgenderism and his heretical declare that “God is non-binary.”
Solely small parts aired on Wednesday’s CBS Night Information and Thursday’s CBS Mornings, so we determined to drill down on the entire interview, posted on-line Wednesday afternoon.
4 and a half minutes in, O’Keefe mentioned Republicans are “operating a handful of highlights of stuff you’ve mentioned previously, and I wished to provide you a chance to reply or make clear.”
O’Keefe started with the October 2021 “God is non-binary” line, questioning: “What did you imply by that?”
Right here is James Talarico’s full change with CBS’s Ed O’Keefe concerning the former’s views on there being six genders, God being “non-binary,” and veganism. As a result of CBS solely had quarter-hour with him, Talarico skated by and even drew some sympathy.
O’Keefe: “[I]t is an efficient… pic.twitter.com/exesgrhy4P
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) Might 28, 2026
Talarico tried to have it each methods, hoping viewers would tune out after claiming he “was being deliberately provocative,” however then doubled down by purposefully misquoting Galatians:
However what it means is that God can’t be outlined by human classes. The Apostle Paul, in his letter to the Galatians, says that in Christ there may be neither male nor feminine. I’m at all times gonna arise for Texans who’re being picked on by essentially the most highly effective, most corrupt politicians within the nation and I’m gonna proceed doing that on this race and hopefully within the U.S. Senate.
In Paul’s letter to the Galatians, he was referring to the truth that, in Christ, we’re all his Chosen folks as, as long as we’ve positioned our hope in Him and declared our want for a Savior, there is no such thing as a distinction made in His eyes between whether or not we’re male vs. feminine followers.
This was the one one O’Keefe had a follow-up on: “You name it deliberately provocative. You remorse describing it that approach or speaking about God that approach?”
Talarico filibustered by stating he “missed the mark” and turning the main focus from his acts of heresy to Republican opponent Ken Paxton (click on “increase”):
I — there are some statements that I’ve made that I definitely remorse. There are statements that I’ve made the place I’ve missed the mark. I’ll be the primary to confess that. However Ken Paxton is deliberately clipping my cringy feedback to distract from his profession of corruption. Ken Paxton has a felony report. I’ve a legislative report. I’ve served for 4 phrases within the Texas Home of Representatives the place I introduced Democrats and independents collectively to truly make progress for folks.
I’ve introduced Republican legislators and Democratic legislators collectively to chop property taxes, to boost trainer pay, to decrease the price of housing and childcare and prescribed drugs. I’ve handed greater than 60 bipartisan payments as a legislator. I’ve additionally referred to as out the extremes in each events on the left and the suitable. I’ve referred to as out Ken Paxton for his blatant corruption, however I additionally referred to as out President Biden for failing to safe our Southern border[.]
On Talarico’s declare of six genders, O’Keefe questioned: “Once more, in 2021, whereas debating a invoice that restricted transgender scholar athletes, you mentioned ‘fashionable science acknowledges six organic variations based mostly on chromosomes’ to argue that intercourse is a nuanced spectrum, not a strict binary. Do you continue to imagine there are six organic sexes?”
The Texas Democrat blunted his reply whereas nonetheless not giving an inch to those that imagine in primary biology: “I do know there are two sexes, women and men. I additionally know there’s a really small proportion of people that have these chromosomal abnormalities, and I imagine they should be handled with dignity and respect.”
When one believes there are six genders like he does, that’s excess of female and male with a small subset falling sufferer to gender dysphoria or being born with mutations.
Together with the ultimate critique from the suitable about his penchant for shying away from meat, O’Keefe lamented the GOP’s deal with transgenderism has turn out to be “an efficient argument…towards candidates for years” that “works for them, and also you’re gonna need to spend money and time explaining it away” (click on “increase”):
O’KEEFE: The opposite one they preserve harping on, and it’s maybe essentially the most curious of all, they are saying you’re a vegan.
TALARICO: I’m not a vegan. I’m an eighth technology Texan. I’ve been consuming barbecue since earlier than, Kem Paxton’s first indictment, and this marketing campaign principally runs on Texas barbecue. If all they’ve is mendacity about me being a vegan, I really feel fairly good about our probabilities this November.
O’KEEFE: — and that is a part of the place I believe we’re in politics on this nation, whether or not you agree or disagree with their deal with these statements on that concern of transgender rights and issues like whether or not you’re a vegan, it’s an efficient argument that Republicans have made towards candidates for years. It really works for them, and also you’re gonna need to spend money and time explaining it away.
TALARICO: I believe the rationale that we’re main in each private and non-private ballot towards Ken Paxton is as a result of Texans are hungry for a unique type of politics. Texans are drowning. We are able to’t afford the fundamentals. We are able to’t afford groceries or fuel or insurance coverage or housing or childcare or our prescribed drugs, and Ken Paxton clearly has no options to supply us. So, whereas he divides us with these identical drained tradition struggle fights, I’m gonna preserve bringing Texans collectively to tackle his corruption and decrease our prices.
Given the truth that Talarico hasn’t sat for a lot of precise interview (i.e. not with CNN and MS NOW laptops), O’Keefe’s different questions had been brief and generic (click on “increase”):
Why are Republicans so fearful about this race?
(….)
However no Democrat has received a Senate seat from Texas since earlier than you had been born. What’s it about you that’s totally different from all these different Democrats? What do you bought that they didn’t?
(….)
They’re gonna have the ability to play consuming video games throughout your speeches and your interviews. What number of occasions you utilize the phrase corruption? However it does sound like a key phrase and a key argument you’re making right here.
(….)
And it’s additionally why the Republicans are on the assault. This morning, the President calls you the — perhaps the worst Texas candidate he’s ever seen. And Ken Paxton, your opponent, has taken to calling you Talafreakco.
(….)
And that’s why I wished to go subsequent, as a result of that’s the concern voters inform us only a quantity one among them, the economic system. What’s an affirmative factor a Senator Telerico would suggest to do to chop prices?
(….)
One of many causes costs have spiked is due to the struggle with Iran, which started actually the evening earlier than we final spoke to you again in early March. The Republican and the President’s argument primarily boils right down to it was price it in the long run. So, I ask you, as a result of that is one thing senators are contemplating are gonna need to proceed to contemplate, was it price killing the Ayatollah if it means Iran doesn’t get a nuclear weapon?
(….)
One component of probably stopping Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, is the present U.S. army support to Israel. Rising variety of Democrats within the Senate, although, proceed to vote towards offering extra army gear to Israel. What would a Senator Talarico do: vote for towards extra army gear to Israel?
(….)
There are some Democrats who name what the Israeli authorities has executed in Gaza genocide. You may go that far?
(….)
The opposite distinctive and acute concern on this state is immigration. It’s gonna be the subject of debate amongst a minimum of Senate Republicans within the subsequent few months. Senator Cornyn goes again to an argument over whether or not or to not absolutely fund — an elevated funding for immigration and customs enforcement, customs and border safety. I think about you oppose what Republicans are proposing to do?
(….)
[Y]ou speak about the concept that it’s a entrance porch down there on the southern border, that there’s a welcome mat out, however there’s a lock on the door, and a complete method.
To see the related transcript from the Might 27 interview, click on right here. To see the transcripts of the recaps from Might 27 and 28, click on right here (for the CBS Night Information) and right here (for CBS Mornings).
