What, precisely, does a Director of Cognitive Benefit do? It’s not a title most Individuals encounter, and it sits far outdoors the acquainted contours of diplomacy, army drive, or financial leverage. However as Chenoweth explains, the competition for affect now not stays neatly inside these lanes both.
His focus is usually on the grey area – the place data, notion, tradition, and habits collide, and the place adversaries like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea are working with staggering assets and strategic focus.
On this Cipher Transient dialog, Chenoweth breaks down how cognitive operations really work, why the U.S. has struggled to maintain tempo, and what it means to offer the President an “data possibility” that’s not merely kinetic or financial.
He affords uncommon, candid perception into how know-how, AI, and social platforms—from TikTok to algorithmically pushed personas—are reshaping the battlespace quicker than policymakers can write doctrine.
Our dialog is a deep dive into one of many least understood – however maybe most consequential – fronts of contemporary nationwide safety. Our dialog has been flippantly edited for size and readability.
Shawn Chenoweth
Shawn Chenoweth is the Director of Cognitive Benefit on the US Nationwide Safety Council.
The Cipher Transient: How do you clarify the function of the director of Cognitive Benefit?
Chenoweth: If you have a look at conventional parts of army energy, you most likely consider the DIME assemble. It is not an ideal assemble, but it surely’s fairly good. DIME, is damaged down into Diplomatic, Info, Navy and Financial, and it’s totally clear who owns the Diplomatic, Navy, and Financial elements. However there hasn’t been, at the least in a number of a long time, a very good instance of the place folks have actually come to the president and the administration with an “I” possibility, for Info. And it is a disgrace as a result of while you really have a look at the DIME assemble, you do not wish to break it into range pipes. We should always consider it as a cell. Every of these parts acts as a part of a functioning cell, and eradicating any of these parts means you may have an imperfect or failing cell.
So, I used to be requested to assist put the “I” again in DIME in order that we will present extra choices and benefits throughout the opposite parts of DIME to nationwide energy and supply the president with alternatives to perform the Administration’s aims that are not simply warheads on foreheads or threatening economics or expending political leverage. We are able to improve these issues, however we will additionally acquire benefits by utilizing cognitive results by means of the knowledge surroundings.
Kelly: Let’s set the stage a bit additional. In the event you had been to clarify to the typical American what is occurring by way of cognitive warfare within the grey zone – the world the place battle happens beneath the extent of warfare – how would you describe it?
Chenoweth: I feel in case you look by means of your army histories, philosophers, politicians, political science, it is all fairly clear. You may pick the weather. All of them have one underlying thread, which is that political victory is the one which issues at its core. That is actually what we’re speaking about. Nothing’s modified. How human beings are linked, how know-how is affected has definitely modified. However what we actually care about is what folks do in the actual world and the geophysical world, the world we stay in.
So, the purpose of a cognitive benefit is to leverage that in order that human beings are taking behaviors favorable to outcomes, to nationwide aims, which more often than not are additionally – within the case of america – favorable in their very own proper. So it is core. And that’s what we’re driving to get: these benefits in what folks do in the actual world by means of their sensing, to make choices that come again to the actual world and have the consequences that you really want.
Kelly: Are you able to give an instance of what that may appear to be?
Chenoweth: As an instance you are negotiating for a chunk of land or a base that you simply want for overflight intel assortment. You are going to conduct a trade-off in negotiations. Perhaps it will appear to be, – in case you pay extra, you may get extra – primarily based off what the worth proposition is. However very not often is it that blatant and easy. So, what you need to have the ability to do is perceive, what benefit would we want within the negotiation? What’s really driving this different get together apart from possibly simply price or simply hazard? What’s the chance calculus?
There are cultural nuances that have an effect on issues: their understanding of affect, political implications. So, the purpose can be to grasp why they’d have an interest on this within the first place? What benefit does it give them? What are the cultural nuances? Why would not they do that within the first place? Why aren’t they taking this motion and what can we do to make it possible for the end result is what we wish?
There are different areas the place that applies throughout the spectrum.
As an instance we’re conducting counter-terrorism operations, and we all know an goal tends to make use of a specific cafe. Effectively, what in the event that they had been utilizing a unique one which day? What can we do to affect them to go to a spot that is extra favorable for choices to lower our personal danger calculus, both as a result of we wish to conduct a kinetic strike or make an arrest? Perhaps we won’t discover them. So, what if we use that for our intel assortment and our strategies to mainly make them come up on comms and alter their habits so it is simpler to seek out them, acquire on them, and construct the info in order that we will conduct bodily actions to cease or disrupt them? And you may sort of see how that applies throughout the board.
If greater than the individual you are coping with, likelihood is that you’ll be higher at carrying out your consequence. It’s very related with the werewolf concept. It is a sport the place two persons are chosen to be the werewolf of the village and everybody else within the group does not know who the werewolf is. More often than not the people who find themselves the werewolves win the sport as a result of they’ve an data benefit over everybody else enjoying the sport. So, it is a human norm.
And once more, I level out that nothing’s new beneath the solar. It is simply that we’ve not actually thought by means of the implications of what it means within the data age that we stay in – the place everyone seems to be linked by means of software program outlined radios. We’re a good distance away from direct sensing the place it is communication and issues occurring in the actual world. Now we’ve type of oblique sensing the place you are fed knowledge feeds and the whole lot else. We are able to have an effect on cognitive habits in methods we by no means imagined, and we actually have not thought by means of simply as we will attain folks and promote objects. And if I wish to discover an individual whose favourite shade is purple, who’s a army age male who’s actually into Magnum PI, I can discover that individual because of their radio, and I can craft messages particularly for somebody who suits that demographic and transfer them in a specific course. That is the primary time in historical past that that is been the case.
Kelly: You might have a background that mixes each authorities and personal sector expertise. Provided that know-how is being quickly developed within the personal sector, how do you suppose that background offers you a bonus on this function?
Chenoweth: There are lots of people who’ve served within the army and have been contractors however simply by happenstance, I occur to have been in quite a lot of essential areas at essential instances. I feel one of many benefits that has introduced me is that I noticed the frustration throughout the army when the contracting equipment did not work. I used to be additionally empowered by business to go and repair quite a lot of these buildings and allow the federal government to do it, and now I am getting afforded the chance to work on coverage to make the system actually hum.
I feel the benefit with that’s that on the subject of the knowledge area, there is no management. And I attempt to emphasize this to any coverage maker or energy dealer or resolution maker that I can discover. You may put an armored brigade in an intersection – absolutely outfitted, absolutely supported – and a U.S. Armored Brigade might personal that intersection. There are issues you possibly can management. However on the subject of the knowledge area, there isn’t any management. It’s always shifting, always altering. You might have a binary resolution. You might be both going to take part, ideally at a degree that issues, or not, and no matter’s going to occur goes to occur.
So, you might end up in an advantageous data area within the morning, lose it by the late morning, get a stalemate within the afternoon, and win it again within the afternoon – simply to lose it once more on the finish of the day. And while you get up the subsequent morning, you are going to must do it yet again. There isn’t any, “We’ve got data dominance and we’re carried out and we will crack our beers and go on with different issues.”
That is not how this works as a result of each day new data is being injected into the system. Persons are altering and creating new opinions. Issues are occurring and persons are going to react to these issues, change their opinions, adapt, age out, age in, so these cultural references could change. It is a fixed flux. One of many issues that from the U.S. authorities facet we’re getting our head round is that we want an data service group always working afloat within the data surroundings, successfully. One which’s engaged 24/7 to have an effect on these adjustments.
The Cipher Transient is partnering with the Info Professionals Affiliation and the Nationwide Heart for Narrative Intelligence to deliver you Pinnacle 2026: Grey Zone Convergence: Cognitive Safety on the Intersection of Affect, Innovation, and Shared Pursuits. Register for the February 9-10 convention now to safe your spot.
Kelly: It is not simply america that has gotten fairly good at understanding the impression of cognitive benefit. We see these techniques from China and Russia getting used with gorgeous success. On this function, how centered are you on their actions on the subject of doing the very same factor that you simply’re tasked with doing?
Chenoweth: They completely observe these actions. I name them the ‘CRINKETT’. Each problem we’re typically coping with falls within the CRINKETTS. It is China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Terrorists and Trans[national] criminals. And notably for the nation states, that is precisely how they wish to compete.
From their perspective, there are two methods to take care of america: asymmetrically and stupidly, largely due to our financial and army energy. They get that. They are not concerned about a kinetic battle; that’s an terrible prospect. So the best way they wish to do that is in grey zone actions, within the data area, within the cognitive area.
And so they outspend us. I am not going to say essentially outperform, however I will say if you wish to compete at a degree that issues, they outspend us, interval. Iran most likely spends round $1.8 billion plus-minus a 12 months, possibly extra with their proxies and the whole lot else they do on this explicit area. Russia – put up Ukraine invasion, spends about $2.6 billion, one thing like that. China – 48 plus billion {dollars} a 12 months. The U.S., if I take all the actions from the DoD, the State Division and the whole lot else, and you set these collectively, you may method $1.2 billion.
It doesn’t suggest we’re executing these funds both. It simply implies that that is what we have allotted. When you consider how we outspend to have a bonus on the opposite components of DIME, we’re hideously underperforming right here. And once more, all props to the administration. They’re aware of this and the help I’ve had on the Nationwide Safety Council and throughout the weather of presidency – the departments and companies – has been stellar. And we’ll proceed to work on this and get it proper as a result of we’ve three and a half extra years of President Trump’s administration to get this proper, do the reps and units, and make this a sturdy coverage in order that the American folks can begin having fun with these advantages that come after we’re actually centered on this area.
Kelly: What does success appear to be for you on this function and the way do you measure it?
Chenoweth: Measurement has at all times been a humorous factor. Individuals will always inform me how laborious it’s to measure these actions. And what I’ve discovered time and time once more is that we’re really fairly good at these actions. The problems with the measurements are, once more, collaborating at a scale that issues. We have to measure habits change, and as a way to do this, we have to have clear aims. What are we after?
The massive a part of that’s who’s the target market that has the company to do the factor we wish? We spend quite a lot of time planning and CONOPS [Concept of Operations] on sub-target audiences that do not even have the company – in hopes that they have an effect on company – and that is completely fantastic. However why are we doing assessments towards this? We spend quite a lot of money and time producing assessments to focus on audiences that do not have the company you need. So, let’s concentrate on the target market that has the company and let’s do that at scale.
For instance; I am within the DC space and I can go all the way down to the Potomac River, drop a bucket of water within the river, and I’ve objectively molecularly elevated the quantity of water within the Potomac. There is not a sensor on this planet that’s going to detect that molecular change.
The actual fact is that you simply may be having an impact, however you do not have a sensor that’s going to select that up. So, it is advisable enhance your scale or customise your sensing system to the impact you are having. That tends to be the place the assessments collapse.
I’ve heard on a regular basis for many years now that assessments are so laborious. I do not discover that to be true. What I discover is that you have sacrificed assessments for impact, which is ok. It is danger calculus. If I had a low quantity of assets and I made a decision to place as a lot into the impact I’ve needed, that is fantastic. However on the finish of the day, you are in search of the actual habits change within the focused viewers that issues. What are the sensors you may have on that and what are you doing to gather that knowledge: public opinion, analysis surveys, constructing the networks. We’ll see this exacerbate additional because the AI revolution continues at tempo.
Kelly: How is know-how impacting what you are making an attempt to do, your mission, after which how are you additionally working with the personal sector as a result of the personal sector is controlling a lot of the know-how and the innovation that the federal government must work with. So how are you doing that?
Chenoweth: One of many challenges I see rising from AI is that there is type of an assumption that AI will repair all of your woes. I’ve seen the perfect instruments on the market do one factor: they mannequin the info they’ve, and that is the core situation. We do not have the info. So once more, I am again to there’s not a complete lot of recent issues beneath the solar. And the AI fashions are actually good, and it may possibly help you discover new insights from the info that you’ve got, however new knowledge must be created. So, sacrificing assortment methodologies and new approaches to collect the info on the foot of a mannequin is horrible.
The AI snake oil salesman I might take care of in business on a regular basis would are available and say, ‘Oh, you are concerned about that? I might completely mannequin you the factor.’ Cool. How does that work? ‘Effectively, all you need to do is present me the info and we’ll put all this collectively and provide the insights.’ I am like, whoa. We do not have the info both. Nobody has the info. That is sort of the issue. So, let’s be trustworthy about what we’re doing.
AI goes to be an incredible boon for business and for the federal government and everybody else beneath the solar. It’ll clearly have impression, however I feel as that strikes ahead, we have to begin taking a look at how we really make use of it. Constructing an agent or a token for each employee so that they are augmented by an AI that does the factor that they themselves will not be good at or saving them time goes to be wonderful, but it surely must be undergirded by with the ability to detect what’s really occurring out in the actual world. And people two issues are usually not essentially – not interrelated. As I stated, most issues are sort of a complete cell that function in a single unit, and we won’t essentially bifurcate this stuff after which anticipate good outcomes.
Former Senior CIA Government Dave Pitts wrote a three-part collection solely for The Cipher Transient on what the U.S. can do to change into extra aggressive within the Grey Zone. Subscriber+Members can learn it right here. Want entry? We might help with that.
Kelly: So you may have a mission that’s tough to measure, is massively impactful, adversaries are utilizing it as effectively towards Americans successfully, and in some instances, these adversaires are dedicating much more assets to this. In the event you might explaine to the typical U.S. citizen how they may be focused by cognitive operations which can be carried out by U.S. adversaries, what would you inform them to search for?
Chenoweth: You might want to be conscious of sources clearly. After I have a look at the assemble of how we method cognitive warfare, I feel one of many greatest issues I’ve had for at the least the final 10 years has been the assemble of dis- and misinformation. My situation is not the dis- and misinformation assemble. It is the overuse of it.
Disinformation and misinformation are issues. They’ve that means. However they imply one thing that’s true and other people use it for issues that aren’t true. For instance, disinformation are lies. The individual projecting the knowledge is aware of it is a lie. They’re doing it to perform an goal. The larger downside of disinformation is misinformation. These are people who find themselves sharing these lies, not realizing they’re lies, or taking issues out of context like satire, et cetera, and propagating as if it had been fact. These are what these are.
However not the whole lot we’ve to take care of falls into that assemble. There are two different parts to this that we’ve to be conscious of.
One is lacking data, which used to imply that the target market wasn’t knowledgeable sufficient to make an accurate resolution, favorable to them or anybody else. ‘It is a tragedy that your member of the family died and it’s best to mourn their loss, however cease touching the physique. That is the way you’re spreading Ebola’, proper? Fairly simple, fairly easy.
Now that we’re coping with nation states with deep pockets, that is been flipped up on its head they usually’re training lively lacking data, the place they may present wire providers into a rustic saying, ‘Congratulations, you should utilize our wire service free of charge and we’ll present you all of the stuff, and that is your greatest price apart from labor. Is not that great? The catch is that you simply simply have to make use of our wire service’.
In the event you suppose [contextual] tales are going to get into the press by means of these channels, good luck. This is not occurring within the third world. These are occurring in main international locations and locations that may shock you.
Think about one thing like, ‘In the event you run this story, all our linked companies which can be linked by means of us or different means are going to tug their promoting price range from you.’ So once more, good luck speaking in regards to the story in your surroundings. Nobody’s going to the touch it. No influencer needs a chunk of it as a result of they’ll lose their incentive construction and their income stream. It is issues like that.
On the opposite facet of the coin, and the larger downside, is the rhetoric data. These are the issues that are not essentially true or false. They’re framed by your worth system, the way you view issues, what you suppose fact really is.
There are folks on the market who will say, I feel a communist socialist type of authorities that’s extremely authoritarian is extra steady and due to this fact higher than a liberal democracy. There are individuals who consider that, and simply by saying, effectively, historical past would show you in any other case, it is not a ok argument. You might want to have interaction with these folks at a scale that issues and be ready to win the argument.
We have seen this time once more on the counter-terrorism entrance the place we might shut down the comms of a no person, and all of the sudden that individual would come again with the popularity that was so invaluable, and now they are a terrorist thought chief as a result of the Western world thought that they had been so harmful they wanted to be shut down as a substitute of simply accepting the very fact, that possibly we must always simply have interaction with this man as a result of nobody’s ever heard of him and possibly we must always simply level out that he is a moron.
There are methods to take care of this, and simply because we do not like one thing doesn’t suggest it is a misinform the individual that’s spreading it. They may consider it. Earlier than we simply title one thing disinformation and say, effectively, it is a lie and we will ignore it — that isn’t sufficient within the trendy period the place everyone seems to be linked as a result of, once more, this individual has connective tissue to the web. They’ve internet platforms. They are often simply as linked as a authorities if they need to select to be and if they’ve the recognition, as a result of at its core, no matter whether or not or not you are a authorities or a star or anything, you’re preventing for consideration.
Kelly: It’s generally tough for busy Individuals to navigate the knowledge area immediately and know what to consider with out inviting some severe time into the supply. Do you have a look at a part of your mission on this function as serving to folks perceive extra of the context they want as a way to make good choices?
Chenoweth: I have been extra on the facet coping with international audiences. However even in that regard, I feel that it actually issues to ask what are the issues that we all know to be what we really feel are goal truths and issues that matter? Issues that we wish goal audiences to know as a result of we all know it will be higher for them and higher for our aims?
After which what are the issues the place we simply wish to make it possible for if a debate must be had, we facilitate the controversy in order that the target market, notably with an American target market – which once more, it is not my forte, we do not do this in authorities or should not — that must be facilitated by Individuals declaring to one another that we do must have these debates and are available to sort of consensus, understanding that there can be disagreements.
Kelly: Do you suppose your job goes to be much more vital sooner or later or possibly much less?
Chenoweth: I’ve by no means thought the job wasn’t vital. I feel the factor I am having fun with proper now could be that everybody’s sort of getting their head round what this implies. The overused expression that ‘We have to do some issues on Fb,’ while you would have policymakers say, ‘Effectively, I am involved that that may destroy Amazon and web commerce’ and your head would explode as you are making an attempt to clarify, ‘That is simply not how the web works, man.’
We could be comfy working on these platforms and doing issues that we have to do with out destroying web commerce or the web. And now I feel quite a lot of coverage makers and business are all linked. They’re much more comfy doing this stuff. Now could be the time when we have to get to the place the assets and the permissions actually match the flexibility to get us the place we have to be.
I’ve typically not discovered too many authority issues. I typically discover permissions issues. I discover that on the subject of authorities, you virtually at all times discover that each group really has a framework that enables them to do issues. It is simply that somebody someplace within the chain can say no and is all too comfy saying no, as a result of, notably previously administration, they had been very comfy at avoiding danger and never as comfy at managing danger. And that may be a dynamic that we’ve to vary. The world is a dangerous place, and we have to be on the market collaborating in it, throwing our elbows round and managing the chance, not avoiding it.
Kelly: How laborious of a job is it to offer the U.S. the cognitive benefit in immediately’s world?
Chenoweth: It is laborious, tremendously laborious since you’re speaking about altering tradition. I do not suppose the exercise itself and the coverage and the issues that may be carried out are laborious. I feel the laborious half can be altering the tradition and altering folks’s mindsets.
We have talked about the truth that there was once three domains: bodily area, data area and cognitive area. We’ve got to discover the knowledge area and really name it what it’s. There’s the bodily area, the geophysical area. However I just like the ‘kill internet’ method. kill internet will represent a kill chain that’s disrupted, and we’ve to get out of only a kill chain. We have to get right into a kill internet mentality on the subject of cognitive results.
Kelly: Clarify what you imply by a “kill internet”?
Chenoweth: You might have your geophysical world the place issues exist in the actual world, the place the place all of us stay. In terms of the knowledge area, although, it used to consolidate a bunch of issues.
The truth is that after we break that down right into a kill internet, you are wanting out of your bodily area as much as your logic layer. The web is just not some amorphous cloud that wanders round. It is composed of a system of techniques that stay in the actual world. It is knowledge facilities, servers, modems, et cetera. The place does that infrastructure really exist? Generally the recordsdata are within the laptop. So, we have to be conscious of the place does that work? How does the web, how do these buildings work, the cellular networks, et cetera.
From there, it then creates the digital layer, the place all of the trons are that exist. You may have results, that is the place your actual our on-line world comes into play. That is how the cellular units work, however that’s simply knowledge.
Then it goes as much as the persona entity degree. These are the actual human beings, generally pretend human beings, they’re personas, organizations however entities that doubtlessly might be focused or addressed or engaged, et cetera.
After which there’s the cognitive area. The trick within the cognitive area is what occurs within the thoughts. And that thoughts is influenced by the sensing that goes up by means of that chain once they course of it. You are in a position to interdict on its manner up or affect, and also you’re in a position to affect on the best way down when a choice is made.
For instance, when one thing occurs in the actual world, it is communicated to a choice maker, however it will undergo the logic layer transmitted by means of sensors, computer systems, emails, telephones, et cetera, to folks and entities who’re going to course of it themselves, talk it to a choice maker who’s going to decide primarily based off that data, or a person or a bunch of people.
They’re all going to make choices on methods to react to that or not react to that. And that is going to return all the way down to the bodily world once they say, ‘I do not actually like what is occurring’, or possibly ‘I do like what’s occurring. Let’s do the factor’. They will talk that all the way down to ‘Sure, launch the missiles’, or ‘Let’s have a protest’. So, you possibly can have an effect on the chain up. You may have an effect on the chain down, however that is the way it works.
We as america have a pipe that exists inside that kill internet construction – so does everybody else. And it does not matter in case you’re a nation state or a household or a person. You might have your sensing sources.
As I discussed earlier, the direct conversations between folks in the actual world – even now, you and I are speaking fully over that whole construction – and that construction might be affected on the best way up as we’re speaking to when that is lastly produced and goes again out to the actual world the place all of the sudden I’ve AI results on me and I am saying issues I by no means meant to say, however the remainder of the world’s now decoding that.
I did not say that, that wasn’t my cognitive resolution, however you intercepted on the best way down and now you’d inadvertently have an effect on everybody else’s cognitive method to what I am speaking.
Kelly: What does the long run from a know-how and AI standpoint actually appear to be?
Chenoweth: It is having basic adjustments. It’ll be attention-grabbing to see what occurs within the leisure business as AI takes over and all of the sudden folks can have extra entry. We have seen how the music business went by means of enormous change simply on streaming music. We’re about to witness what that is going to appear to be from our extra conventional platforms. We have seen how issues transfer from streaming. I feel there’s a degree of adaptation that is going to go together with that.
One of many issues that must be addressed is how precisely we’ll have interaction. There’s a level the place we have to be comfy with giving type of steering to the AIs – human within the loop – however in case you suppose that you are going to have the ability to assessment each single message that should exit in an AI-driven world, you are out of your thoughts.
So, you want to have the ability to be comfy producing on your target market profiles and provides type of thematic steering and let the AI do some degree of engagements towards international audiences to steer conversations in a specific course, or at the least establish the place a dialog may be going so you possibly can intervene when it seems to be like choices are being made in a foul manner, after which discover out if that’s an open and trustworthy cultural nuance factor the place it’s about engagement or if it is being steered by your opponent.
I feel that we’re not far, and we’re most likely already in a sport, the place there are AIs versus AIs as we communicate within the data surroundings.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Transient as a result of Nationwide Safety is Everybody’s Enterprise.
