Tuesday, March 11, 2025
HomeWorld NewsAn intriguing however irritating window into Obama’s West Asia coverage

An intriguing however irritating window into Obama’s West Asia coverage

-


Now comes (yet one more!) ebook by one of many hordes of nation-security technocrats who dominate West Asian policymaking in Democratic administrations right here in Washington. On this case, it’s Grand Delusion: The Rise and Fall of American Ambition within the Center East, a latest ebook by Steven Simon, a man who has labored as first a profession civil servant after which a political appointee in U.S. administrations going again to Pres. Ronald Reagan, and who between authorities stints has transited via DC’s ever whirling revolving door into presumably profitable positions in all of the “normal” sorts of militaristic think-tanks.

Don’t yawn but, although. In contrast to most of his counterparts within the nat-sec punditocracy who’ve written memoirs of their occasions in workplace, Simon at the very least began to mirror on “what went improper” with U.S. coverage in the direction of West Asia (the “Center East.”) And within the chapter on the Obama administration—through which he served as senior NSC director for the Center East and North Africa—he reveals numerous jaw-dropping particulars that assist to elucidate the in-bred, reflexively pro-military and pro-Israeli ambiance of not simply the explicitly political class in DC but additionally extensive swathes of the supposedly “coverage mental” class of DC think-tank-dom.

My favourite such tidbit comes within the pretty intensive part of the Obama chapter through which he’s writing about Obama’s Syria coverage. On p.322, he writes about how, after he’d left the White Home and was “on a enterprise journey to Beirut”, he obtained an oblique invitation to go to Damascus for a discreet assembly with Pres. Assad. (This should have been early 2015, although he doesn’t pin a date onto it.) He duly went again to Washington and consulted with Rob Malley, who had changed him within the NSC job and who was proper then working laborious on the JCPOA with Iran. Malley agreed that it could be good for Simon to go to Damascus to see if there could possibly be a approach for a de-escalation course of to start out there, as nicely.

Simon writes this (pp.323-24):

This can be a really refreshing option to write an “contained in the Beltway” memoir! The “miraculous” (!) $20 million donation from the UAE that helped the Center East Institute to remain alive in that period has actually been written about earlier than (e.g., right here.) However I’ve by no means earlier than seen any coverage pundit write so overtly in regards to the stress that MEI’s management—like that of almost each different DC think-tank—places on its affiliated “students” to hew to the donors’ line.

And are available to suppose it, there aren’t that many members of the DC punditocracy who would write so frankly about Israel’s use of suppose tanks to “disseminate the views of their sponsors and affect Washington opinion.”

Because it occurred, Simon did get his one-on-one with Pres. Asad. Then, on his approach again to DC, he briefed Malley in Lausanne on how his dialog had gone. When each males had been again in DC they met once more. Malley stated he had mentioned the Assad-Simon overture along with his boss, NSC adviser Susan Rice…

who was towards entertaining an overture from Assad. Malley defined her place… Assad, he stated, was in a determined scenario; why throw him a lifeline? … With some remorse I signaled contacts within the area that there was no prospect of a deal alongside the strains I’d mentioned in Damascus, and there the matter ended. Malley, on reflection, mused [when???] that turning off the channel to Assad had been a mistake, however in fact there was no going again. (p.325)

Really, the entire of the Obama chapter is studded with nice revelations, regarding many facets of the Obama administration’s steps and gross mis-steps in Palestine, Libya, and Syria. So sure, an absolute must-read. However I’ve to warn you that this chapter, like the remainder of the ebook is so extraordinarily poorly organized that studying it’s a laborious and complicated slog. Simon’s editors at Penguin did him an enormous dis-service by not insisting that he manage all of the tidbits, vignettes, and reflections he presents right here right into a coherent (and far more chronological) narrative. The notable lack of dates throughout the sections is simply one of many textual content’s many flaws…

Some fast examples of the textual content’s disorganization from the Obama chapter will suffice. My very own clear recollection of the beginning of the Obama administration was that he got here into workplace shortly after the ghastly Israeli assault on Gaza often known as “Operation Solid Lead” had lastly wound down. That assault affected not solely the Palestinian-Israeli dynamic but additionally the politics of the complete area. However not a point out of it right here, although Simon did commit a couple of disjointed segments of the chapter to the parlous stasis (or worse) in Palestinian-Israeli negotiations. No point out, both, of Obama’s appointment on Day 1 or Day 2 of his presidency of former Sen. George Mitchell as his Palestinian-Israeli particular negotiator. (Sure, there’s a point out in a while of the dreadful Dennis Ross elbowing his approach into the negotiation, however sadly little context is given to that, both.)

Then, if you wish to truly observe the narrative on Obama’s coverage on Syria, if is totally crucial to grasp that Islamic State had been infiltrating individuals, weapons, and cash into Syria (from Iraq and Turkey) from early 2012 and that from mid-2013 on it broke with the Qaeda-affiliated forces there and proceeded—in parallel with the Al-Qaeda formations there—to batter the government-held areas very laborious, seizing Raqqa and quite a few different cities and coming very near Aleppo.

However no, in Simon’s textual content, there are sections on Obama’s Syria coverage with no point out of IS’s eruption into the Northeast of the nation; after which later, there are sections on Obama’s coverage towards Islamic State. It simply doesn’t make sense except you already know the backstory and might piece the entire, broader story collectively your self.

There are additionally frustratingly few descriptions of the extent to which the arms and cash Washington funneled to the Syrian opposition simply ended up being handed straight on to both the Islamic State or the Al-Qaeda associates, most of the particulars relating to which had been pretty nicely documented on the time… and even much less precise evaluation of how that got here to occur, both in Syria or in Libya…

Simon doesn’t current the destiny of U.S. insurance policies as unfolding in actual time, with totally different story-lines interacting and intersecting all alongside the way in which, and as affecting actual, very massive, and deeply struggling societies. He presents it extra as a sequence of small, disjointed and sterile case-studies.

Which is a pity, as a result of he has a robust set of tales to inform and appears little inhibited by Washington’s normal type of (pro-military, pro-Israeli) “political correctness.” And at many factors—as along with his telling of the MEI story, or his many references to Biden’s function as a fuzzy and fixed protector for Israel—he appears fairly able to disclose to his readers many often well-hidden facets of how it’s that energy truly will get wielded throughout the DC Beltway.

In his Preface, he writes this (pp. xiv-xv):

I used to be a bit stunned by the reference to the Lord’s Prayer there, and in addition by the reference (nevertheless perfunctory) to “the price of American actions to largely powerless Center Jap populations.” Then I learn on Simon’s Wikipedia web page that he has an MTS from Harvard Divinity College. It strikes me he may be capable to work fairly a bit extra with the fabric he has on this ebook and write a really a lot better, extra reflective and constructive ebook each about what went improper with U.S. policymaking that led to all that hurt that U.S. leaders inflicted on Center Jap populations—and in addition, about what Individuals and our leaders may do to finish and make reparations for that hurt.

But when he does that, he completely mustn’t use the identical editors he had from Penguin. Please!

Related articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Latest posts