CNN’s chief media analyst Brian Stelter induced unintentional laughter in his “Dependable Sources” publication Thursday. In his typical position as defender of CNN’s viciously anti-Trump bias, he complained that anybody criticizing Natasha Bertrand’s anonymously-sourced claims that Operation Midnight Hammer solely set the Iran nuclear program again a couple of months is unpatriotic. The media, they’re the patriotic ones!
This was how Brian started:
Questioning energy is our responsibility
Journalists ask questions, vet the solutions and report the outcomes to the general public. That’s just about the job description. However the Trump administration is claiming that it’s unpatriotic to take action. At the moment President Trump is pushing for firings and Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth is insulting journalists to their faces….
Fox’s Joe Concha supplied the straightforward rebuttal, since Stelter did not take this method to President Biden in decline. CNN’s Abby Phillip additionally took what was clearly the CNN get together line. For those who query our Trump-loathing, you are the autocrat.
Manner too straightforward… https://t.co/CsX5KAmWo9 pic.twitter.com/9WZfIAreDw
— Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) June 27, 2025
Stelter continued that they merely should query the White Home (effectively, some White Homes) on their official accounts:
Tapper cited previous examples of presidency deception to say “historical past has taught us that probably the most pro-servicemember motion we will take is to ask questions of our leaders, particularly in instances of battle. That, for journalists, is the peak of patriotism.“
Certainly, historical past is replete with proof that it’s crucial to query official accounts. It is patriotic. “What’s unpatriotic is making an attempt to scare the press into silence,” media historian Brian Rosenwald says.
Trump needs cheerleaders, however…
Each CNN and The New York Instances have issued statements defending their correct reporting in regards to the early US intel evaluation that undercut Trump’s “obliterated” claims. The reporting has been credibly sourced and cautious.
In response, Trump has charged the press with making an attempt to “demean” the navy motion, and has claimed that the B-2 pilots had been “devastated” by the information protection. He’s removed from the primary politician to use the navy as a protect in opposition to fair-minded scrutiny.
“Honest-minded scrutiny” is CNN? Three years of Russiagate and a whole lot of interviews with Stormy Daniels & Michael Avenatti, et cetera — that was “truthful”?
As Twitchy famous, Stelter can not seem to inform the distinction between journalism and partisan activism — or he thinks activism is the easiest journalism. We have identified earlier than that journalism awards aren’t a lot about “excellence” as they’re about selecting the correct targets. No person has at hand again their Pulitzer Prize for being flawed about Russiagate — as a result of the trigger was simply.
Now Stelter famous the Emmy Awards had been “sending a message” by giving awards to 60 Minutes whereas they have been sued by Trump for his or her slicing-and-dicing bias towards Kamala Harris:
Final night time on the Information Emmys, the judges needed to ship a message of assist to CBS Information and “60 Minutes” amid Trump’s ongoing authorized battle with the information division. CBS took dwelling 5 Emmys complete, probably the most of any community, together with three for “60 Minutes” experiences.
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) June 26, 2025
Being criticized and sued by Trump routinely makes you a patriot and a hero. Nobody ought to consider whether or not or not the reporting is true or “fair-minded scrutiny.”
