The Trump marketing campaign advert displaying Kamala Harris expressing unequivocal help for taxpayer-funded intercourse change surgical procedure for jail inmates, together with unlawful aliens, was undoubtedly probably the most impactful of the 2024 race. It was absolutely probably the most vital marketing campaign advert since Willie Horton did in Michael Dukakis in 1988.
So, you may need thought that when Audie Cornish had a federal choose who issued a ruling mandating such taxpayer-funded surgical procedures as a visitor on the CNN This Morning present she hosts, Cornish simply may need introduced it up. However no. That may have distracted from the section’s theme: Orange Man Unhealthy, and the proverbial menace to American democracy.
On Tuesday’s CNN This Morning, Cornish’s visitor was Mark Wolf, who not too long ago retired as a federal District Court docket choose for the specific function of being free to criticize President Trump. He wrote up a protest article for The Atlantic, which deeply loathes Trump.
Wolf claimed:
“I feel the judiciary is striving, notably the decrease court docket judges, to carry out our basic function of holding elected officers to the boundaries of the ability given to them within the Structure.”
Yo, Your Honor! What’s sauce for elected officers is sauce for the judiciary.
Can Wolf conceivably consider that the Structure provides federal judges the ability to order taxpayer-funded sex-change operations for convicted murderers? And but . .
Per Grok
In Kosilek v. Spencer (2012), Wolf dominated that the Massachusetts Division of Corrections should present taxpayer-funded sex-reassignment surgical procedure for Michelle Kosilek, a transgender inmate convicted of murdering his spouse in 1990. He discovered that denying the surgical procedure violated the Eighth Modification’s prohibition on merciless and strange punishment, because it was medically essential for treating gender dysphoria.
If Cornish had achieved her homework, or been fascinated by a good and balanced section, she would have referred to as Wolf out on that call, which was later overturned by the next court docket. However not a peep about it from Audie. She let Wolf merrily proceed, claiming that “Judges function independently and impartially. The truth that they’re referred to as crooks and biased, does not make them crooks and biased.”
And inevitably, Wolf ended his self-righteous sermon by claiming that President Trump represents an “existential menace” to the rule of regulation and democracy.
There was one other controversial choice of present relevance that Cornish failed to say. In Parker v. Hurley, Wolf dominated that public college dad and mom had no constitutional proper to exempt their elementary youngsters from books selling homosexuality and same-sex marriage, discovering no proof of coercive indoctrination.
Be aware: Wolf was appointed to the bench by President Reagan. Nothing the left loves greater than a convert to the trigger!
Here is the transcript.
CNN This Morning
11/12/25
6:49 am ETPRESIDENT TRUMP: We can not enable a handful of Communist, radical-left judges to impede the enforcement of our legal guidelines and assume the duties that belong solely to the President of the USA. These persons are simply trying to destroy our nation.
AUDIE CORNISH: As Donald Trump’s marketing campaign of authorized retribution continues towards his self-proclaimed political enemies, he is additionally lashed out at judges that he is accused of disloyalty to the nation.
In posts all year long, he is referred to as judges who rule towards the administration monsters. He is referred to as for these judges to be impeached. His deputy chief of workers has referred to as rulings judicial tyranny.
Our subsequent visitor says these verbal assaults have led to actual threats towards the judiciary. And he is really now resigning as a federal choose in order that he can communicate out. In an article in The Atlantic, Choose Mark Wolf says, “The White Home’s assault on the rule of regulation is so deeply disturbing to me that I really feel compelled to talk out. Silence for me is now insupportable.”
. . .
MARK WOLF: I feel the judiciary is striving, notably the decrease court docket judges, to carry out our basic function of holding elected officers to the boundaries of the ability given to them within the Structure.
However they don’t seem to be being strengthened within the present atmosphere as a result of the assaults on judges who make neutral, principled choices after which are referred to as by the president crooked and referred to as to be impeached erodes public confidence within the judiciary, which is crucial to the effectiveness of the courts and the rule of regulation.
CORNISH: One of many issues I need to put to you is that each time a federal prosecutor, or now somebody such as you, comes out and says, look, I am actually pissed off, that is incorrect, that is incorrect, the administration can say, look, that’s revealing the bias. That’s displaying what’s actually happening on the bench. What’s your response to that?
WOLF: I do not know why advocating for the nonpartisan administration of justice, which I discovered was basic to our democracy after I was an assistant to the Lawyer Common of the USA after Watergate, is a scarcity of partiality [sic].
And judges function independently and impartially. The truth that they’re referred to as crooks and biased does not make them crooks and biased, however it does severely
threaten public confidence, which is crucial to the enforcement of court docket orders and important to the rule of regulation.And that’s why I resigned, so I might not be topic to the right restraints on what federal judges can say outdoors of court docket, as a result of I wished to affix many others in advocating for the rule of regulation and democracy, which I feel is now dealing with an existential menace.
