Wednesday, February 11, 2026
HomeOpinionFCC ends 'pretend' rule that fueled cellphone theft

FCC ends ‘pretend’ rule that fueled cellphone theft

-



In 2024, the GOP campaigned on slicing pricey and burdensome laws, noting that deregulation in President Trump’s first time period saved American households $11,000 per household. The pledge was to slash laws that stifle jobs, freedom and innovation, and that make every thing dearer, whereas restoring transparency and customary sense to federal rulemaking.

Federal Communications Fee Chairman Brendan Carr has taken that mandate significantly. The FCC simply ended a long-standing regulation that added useless complexity for cell shoppers whereas actively fueling theft, fraud and transnational gadget trafficking — with stolen telephones flowing from the USA to felony networks in Russia, China, Cuba and past.

Many laws are pretend. They don’t serve their acknowledged function, however they sound good on the floor. On this case, the unlocking rule created actual hurt.

In 2007, the FCC imposed an additional, non-statutory situation on Verizon’s buy of spectrum rights, requiring it — alone amongst carriers — to unlock units simply 60 days after activation, far sooner than commonplace business follow. Telephones that might be unlocked shortly grew to become magnets for theft. Legal networks shortly discovered they might steal Verizon units, wait out the quick unlocking window, and resell them at a premium on the black market.

Much more outrageous, the so-called unlocking mandate was by no means essential within the first place. The mandate originated with a Google lobbyist, cloaked in modern rhetoric of “openness,” however in actuality designed to weaken property rights and shift leverage away from cell community homeowners.

The FCC chairman on the time embraced the thought. Then in 2021, the FCC doubled down, extending the requirement as a situation of Verizon’s acquisition of TracFone. Fraud spiked 55% after TracFone shifted from a one-year lock to the 60-day coverage.

Regulation enforcement businesses nationwide assist ending this dangerous rule. Federal and state investigations repeatedly confirmed that stolen units weren’t remoted petty crimes however fed bigger felony enterprises, supporting drug trafficking, human smuggling and arranged fraud schemes working throughout borders.

No different main wi-fi supplier was topic to this rule. Others operated in accordance with business requirements for fraud prevention and client safety. The regulatory asymmetry distorted competitors and made Verizon’s units uniquely enticing to criminals.

Carr’s motion restores aggressive neutrality by permitting Verizon to comply with the Shopper Code for Wi-fi Service, the voluntary business commonplace adopted in 2013 that governs unlocking transparency, timing and army protections. Customers usually are not shedding rights. Verizon is solely being allowed to comply with the identical guidelines as everybody else.

The rule of regulation, like that of medication, is easy: first, do no hurt. Washington ignored that precept for practically 20 years. The administration is now doing the work that ought to have been accomplished years in the past — slicing pretend guidelines that failed shoppers and empowered criminals.

Roslyn Layton is a broadband and regulatory economist/InsideSources

Related articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Latest posts