Does your comfy fluoroelastomer smartwatch band comprise poisonous chemical compounds that would switch by your pores and skin and trigger eventual well being points? A scientific research suggests sure, however smartwatch manufacturers like Apple and Google reassured me in any other case — a minimum of about their straps.
Late final 12 months, the nonprofit American Chemical Society posted a damning and regarding report, “Presence of Perfluorohexanoic Acid in Fluoroelastomer Watch Bands,” by Wicks et al., suggesting that the majority widespread watch bands from the previous few years have excessive ranges of PFAS and PFHxA compounds with potential antagonistic well being results to the liver, thyroid, and different organs, in addition to most cancers.
The information made the rounds on client tech websites, and most readers had cause to fret: fluoroelastomer is without doubt one of the most typical band supplies for mainstream watches, together with silicone.
Nevertheless, the research did not say which smartwatch straps they examined had poisonous chemical compounds, besides that they bought 22 bands “throughout quite a few manufacturers and value factors” from Amazon and Greatest Purchase in 2023 and that 13 of the 22 examined bands have been marketed to comprise fluoroelastomer.
I acquired my arms on the total paywalled report, which reveals how they used particle-induced gamma-ray emission and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to find out which bands contained fluoride, PFAS, or PFHxA chemical compounds. The primary is an anticipated ingredient in fluoroelastomer bands; the latter two are seemingly harmful if ingested.
Of the 13 bands marketed as fluoroelastomer, seven had important PFAS/ PFHxA chemical concentrations, whereas six had none or safely negligible concentrations. Of the opposite 9 — seemingly utilizing silicone or different widespread strap supplies — solely one had excessive PFAS/ PFHxA concentrations, and its excessive fluoride share suggests it is perhaps a fluoroelastomer band in disguise.
What does this inform us? Fluoroelastomer bands aren’t inherently harmful as a result of some manufacturers take away or keep away from utilizing dangerous chemical compounds of their manufacturing. The issue is {that a} majority of manufacturers do not trouble to take action, both out of negligence or ignorance of the implications. And we do not know which manufacturers these are.
Will your fluoroelastomer band truly make you sick?
Ingesting or inhaling PFAS compounds is harmful, however most individuals aren’t going to eat their smartwatch straps. The query is whether or not or not “dermal absorption” of those chemical compounds is probably going over years of sporting your smartwatch.
The staff behind this ACS report can solely reply this query vaguely as a result of “dermal absorption of PFAS is poorly described” in a number of scant research. However as a result of individuals put on smartwatches for 12+ hours per day, it “poses a possibility for important switch to the dermis and subsequent human publicity.”
They particularly counsel that the “extra sweat contact and open pores and skin pores” brought on by sporting health smartwatches for exercises may pose an extra threat — although fortunately, many health watches default to sweat-wicking silicone or nylon bands.
The research cites exams on mice that point out PFAS and PFHxA will finally take up into your organs and bloodstream if positioned on the pores and skin. An “in vitro human pores and skin equal mannequin” absorbed “greater than 50% of a PFHxA publicity dose.”
Regardless of all this fearful language, it stays educated conjecture, not a certainty. It is unclear how a lot PFAS and PFHxA will truly switch into your physique over time and whether or not it will ever attain excessive sufficient ranges to pose a well being threat.
The research itself concludes that the findings “spotlight a essential want for a extra complete publicity research of PFHxA that arises from fluoroelastomer watch bands worn on human pores and skin.” They by no means conclude a direct correlation between sporting a fluoroelastomer band and getting sick.
Some fluoroelastomer bands have poisonous chemical compounds, however we do not know whether or not they truly switch by your pores and skin, or if it is sufficient to trigger long-term hurt.
A related parallel to this fear-inducing research is the latest panic over black plastic cooking utensils and pans with excessive ranges of flame retardants (through the New York Occasions), with proof suggesting that these chemical compounds may leach into your meals over time, particularly within the presence of excessive cooking temperatures and oils.
That report in all probability led to some mass-dumping of black plastic spatulas, nevertheless it arose later in 2024 that the scientists had made a math error that magnified the problem by 10X, making it look worse than it was. And actually, the one manner that the retardants will switch to your meals in important portions is for those who go away your spatula sitting in sizzling oil for minutes at a time, which most individuals naturally would not do.
My level is you possibly can actually substitute your fluoroelastomer band; there are such a lot of watch band options like silicone, nylon, steel, and leather-based, for those who’re involved. Nevertheless, till there’s concrete proof of the price or impression of dermal PFAS/PFHxA absorption in people, you should not panic concerning the years you’ve got spent sporting a fluoroelastomer strap.
Plus, your fluoroelastomer band could not have any PFAS or PFHxA chemical compounds to start with!
Manufacturers like Apple and Google say their bands are secure
I emailed my contacts at Apple, Google, and Samsung about this report, asking if they’ve any touch upon the findings, if their clients have cause to change bands, and if they will change any manufacturing processes sooner or later.
Samsung has but to get again to me, however Apple and Google readily shared white papers indicating that they are already conscious of the potential risks and proactively take away PFAS from their smartwatch bands.
“Pixel Watch bands meet business requirements with regard to PFAS,” Google informed Android Central. “We proactively restrict PFAS in our merchandise and are dedicated to minimizing PFAS past what’s required by legislation.” Its white paper references PFAS, saying it will keep away from “detectable ranges” or as much as 25 ppb of the compound in any system.
Apple’s assertion echoes Google’s, and the corporate shared its 2022 white paper outlining its PFAS coverage.
“Over a decade in the past, we efficiently eradicated two PFAS members — PFAS and PFOA — from our merchandise,” Apple informed Android Central. “Apple has been working to part out PFAS from all our merchandise and manufacturing processes, which incorporates partaking with all of our provide chain companions and creating safer options.”
I am going to replace this put up if Samsung responds, however I did discover the Samsung Electronics Requirements for Management of Substances utilized in merchandise, which lists PFAS in its “Doubtlessly Danger Substances” and PFHxA in its “Restricted Substances” record with a 25㎍/kg most; nevertheless, it lists July 2026–2027 because the implement date, so it is potential that it has been (or is presently) utilized in “pores and skin contact textiles.”
On the very least, it is comforting that the most important smartwatch manufacturers have acknowledged the risks of poisonous compounds in smartwatch straps and brought steps to take away them. It is potential that two of the PFAS-free fluoroelastomer bands within the 2023 research got here from the Apple Watch S9 and Pixel Watch 2.
In case your Android watch comes from one other model, I nonetheless urge you to not fear prematurely. However most manufacturers supply a straightforward approach to swap out straps for those who do not wish to stress about it, and we do have guides on different bands — like Galaxy Watch 7 bands — if you wish to store round.
